A business that posts only when it has something to sell reaches fewer people with each post than it did with the one before. This is not because the audience is tired of the business. It is because algorithms penalize accounts whose followers do not engage with them. When someone sees your post and does not like it, comment on it, or share it, the algorithm learns that this person is not interested in your content. The next time you post, that person is less likely to see it. If most of your posts get no engagement, the algorithm shows your content to fewer people overall. Eventually, only a fraction of your followers see anything you post, even when you do have something urgent to sell. The mechanism: engagement creates reach, not the reverse Social platforms measure success by how long people spend on them and how often they return. An account that only posts sales messages gets low engagement because a sales message is a transaction, not a conversation. Someone who sees "Co...
A dentist photographs a patient's smile before whitening and posts the before-and-after to Instagram. A lawyer includes a photo of a signed settlement agreement in a case study on LinkedIn. A salon owner films a client's hair transformation and uploads it to TikTok. Each believes they have permission because the patient or client agreed to the procedure itself. They do not.
The regulators named below are US examples. The consent principle is the same everywhere, but the body that hears a complaint and what it can do about it differ by country and by state, so confirm the specifics with your own regulator.
The dentist's mistake: consent to care is not consent to marketing
When a patient signs consent to a root canal, they are agreeing to have the procedure done. They are not agreeing to appear in the dentist's marketing. A cropped clinical photo that shows only teeth is still identifiable when the patient recognizes their own mouth, their own work, their own case in their own community. Before-and-after photos require separate, written consent that specifically describes how and where the image will be used—not a buried clause in the treatment agreement.
The governing body is your state dental board. If a patient complains, the board investigates whether consent was obtained and documented. The complaint itself is not anonymous; you will likely meet the patient again in your community. The board can censure you, suspend your license, or demand you remove the image and notify the patient. Some boards require you to demonstrate that you obtained the consent before the board closes the complaint file.
The lawyer's mistake: client privilege does not immunize you from advertising rules
A lawyer might think that because attorney-client privilege protects the substance of the case, it also protects the case from being cited as an example of the lawyer's work. It does not. State bar advertising rules require that any case description, client testimonial, or result be something you can verify and are willing to have scrutinized. If you post a photo of settlement documents or court filings, you must also have written consent from the client to use that specific material in marketing.
Your state bar is the body that enforces this. If a client or opposing counsel complains, the bar's ethics committee reviews whether you violated advertising rules. The bar can reprimand you, require you to remove the content, place restrictions on future marketing, or recommend discipline to the court. A finding against you becomes part of your public record.
The salon's mistake: the client saw it but did not agree to it
A salon owner films a cut and color while the client is in the chair. The client watches in the mirror and smiles. The owner uploads the video, assuming the smile means yes. It does not. The client consented to sit still and be watched while receiving a service. Consent to being in the salon is not consent to being in a video, broadcast, or posted online where coworkers, family, or competitors can see them.
Written consent should describe the platform where the content will appear, how long it will be live, and whether the client's name and face will be visible. A client might agree to a portfolio on your website but decline TikTok. Another might agree only if she is not named. Some will decline entirely.
If a client asks you to remove an image and you refuse, she can request that the platform remove it under privacy laws, file a complaint with state consumer protection, or pursue a civil claim. The damage is not hypothetical: she may have been recognizable to people who did not know she was a client, her appearance changes over time and she may no longer look like the photo, or she simply did not want this version of herself on the internet. You cannot undo having posted it.
The common thread: document consent before you post
In each case, the service provider assumed that conducting the work was consent to marketing the work. Consent must be separate, specific, and in writing. The consent should say what medium (Instagram, website, printed brochure), how long (permanent, six months), and how identifiable (name visible, face visible, fully anonymized).
Do not combine consent language with your service agreement. Do not ask verbally and assume silence means yes. Do not assume a client who does not object while in your chair has agreed to be posted online later.
Keep the signed consent with the image file so you can produce it if asked. When a client requests removal, honor it. When a client declines, accept it without pressure. The regulator investigating a complaint will look first at your consent form. If it does not exist, the investigation ends there.
Comments
Post a Comment